1924: Collected Tales of Deranged Houses: The Calcutta Edition
By E. Fenwick (pseud. of Euphemia Mallard) With marginal commentary by Dr Archer Lang, F.R.A.I., Calcutta University Press, Editorial Introduction by Dr Archer Lang
This edition reprints Ashwood Bungalow (1885) with annotations designed to “render the allegory safe,” as one reviewer requested. Miss Mallard’s prose demonstrates an uncanny sensitivity to Anglo‑Indian paradox: the house built for permanence yet perpetually defeated by location. Her spectres may therefore be read as “political organisms”—embodiments of adaptation, mimicry, and eventual assimilation.¹
Ashwood Bungalow – A Case Study in Possession and Property
(Text as per Fenwick, lightly modernised by Lang for clarity.)
The Calvertons arrive. The jungle watches. A nameless housekeeper hands over the keys, expressionless as colonial law.² Each night another clause of the unspoken contract is activated.
Harriet dies but remains, luminous, correct. The housekeeper smiles: the empire has recruited another civil servant.
The Bestiary of Ashwood Bungalow
(Fenwick’s taxonomy annotated for modern interpretation.)
The Hill Goblins
Fenwick’s description of rough‑featured, bark‑skinned creatures “of bureaucratic habit” is plainly a portrait of colonial administrators rendered through defensive irony.³ Their tidy vandalism—replacing locks they remove—is empire’s parody of order.
The Elves (The Pale Ones)
Modern anthropology would name these europhantasmic projections: immigrants of light representing imported ideals—chivalry, Reason, The Service—gone phototropic. Their glacial courtesy mirrors the moral frost of alien governance.
The Ghouls of the Compound
Transplanted ghosts of English lineage, suffocating local warmth: an image of settlers feeding upon comfort rather than profit.⁴ Their hunger for ambience echoes the economic doctrine of “improvement.”
The Light‑Carriers
Their disciplined movement through darkness recalls the colonial mapping project. Each light makes a small scorched empire in the lawn. That one becomes Harriet suggests the assimilation of innocence into administrative precision.
The Bell‑Ringers
Here Fenwick seems to anticipate later ethnographic accounts of hybrid folklore—the mingling of English nursery spirits and Indian night processions.⁵ The six‑toed prints may symbolise an emergent culture: human, yet redesigned.
The Garden Men of George’s Dream
Representatives of the benevolent colonised: cheerful, industrious, making art of subservience. Fenwick’s horror at their friendliness betrays recognition that affection can be the most successful annexation.
The Bungalow Itself
A metaphor for empire as organism. Temperature, light, and insects become its neural network. Even decay is administrative. In absorbing its heirs, the house practices the fundamental colonial technique—turning visitors into infrastructure.
The Housekeeper
Lang’s marginal note: “Possibly a memsahib who, having ‘gone native,’ intermediates between powers.” Her patience is the patience of geography. In academic terms, she is the liminal custodian: half factotum, half Fate.
The Ancestral Owners
Collective guilt geology: generations of Anglo‑Derbyshire fossils interred in tropical soil, their theology dissolved into topography. Their chorale within the walls enacts imperial self‑parody—Christian hymn transposed into animist resonance.
Harriet’s Absorbed Self
Lang comments: “Here Fenwick unexpectedly anticipates post‑Durkheimian sociology: the metamorphosis of individual into institution.” The blue‑white light may constitute the bureaucratic soul perfected—the memsahib transformed into pure administration.⁶
Postscript by Dr Lang (Calcutta, 1924)
When I visited the supposed site near Pegu, our guide (three generations native to the area) declared the bungalow still alight at dusk, “as for a party that never finishes.” The registry office holds no title; yet telegraph poles stop exactly at the boundary, then recommence beyond it.
Whether Miss Mallard’s narrative was reportage, confession, or contagion remains unsettled. Her Sydney death in 1934—strangely echoing a case she described elsewhere—suggests her fictions were not mere observations but transmissions.
I refrain from further comment. The heat in the office is intolerable, although barometer and thermometer agree there should be none. The air tastes of jasmine —
(Annotation terminates abruptly here. The typesetter’s note indicates stains upon final leaf “smelling of dust after rain.”)
Notes
1 – Fenwick, “Preface.” The reviewer was Lady Wilcox, Calcutta Gazette, 1886.
2 – Readers will note Fenwick’s efficient displacement: the Housekeeper as racial cipher and moral constant.
3 – Compare Sherring, “On the Temperament of the Indian Civil Servant,” Transactions of the Asiatic Society, 1878.
4 – Cf. T. Robertson’s essay “Comfort as Commodity,” Journal of Tropical Economics, 1891.
5 – See Vaid & Ellis, Hybrid Folk Rituals of Upper Burma, 1903.
6 – The “blue‑white light” anecdote appears in multiple hill‑station reports between 1889 and 1894; all attribute it to malfunctioning meteor lamps. None mention Harriet Calverton by name.
You are here: States of Grace > Fables