1810: Espèce de Canard, Mallard House
Diary entry
There is a kind of weather that insists upon the company of one’s own recollections. The morning opened in a whitish calm—frost upon the upper lawn, and that low mist which makes the lake appear to breathe. The servants move through it as though under glass. Mrs. Blandy declared she heard the Church clock cry before it struck, which I took for exaggeration until I too thought I saw the air “answer” when the ninth note fell. Some reverberations, it seems, are private to the mood.
The ghost was in the south gallery again last night. Not seen—no, it is not that sort of apparition. Rather, it seats itself in expectation; the air leans forward. The lamps there burn longer than common, and the dust smells awake. I passed the tall mirror and observed how my own image hesitated—as if not certain to continue reflecting me. I half smiled to it (which I always think a civil precaution), but the echo of my gesture persisted after my features had composed themselves. “All haunting,” said the late Dr. Fenimore—who wrote his treatise on optical conscience, 1782—“is continuity mistaken for return.” I have that line pressed upon a scrap of vellum between the pages of my Psalter.
I cannot precisely account for it, but since last winter I perceive Mallard House to contain a rhythm not of footsteps but of withheld speech. The tapestries sway very lightly when no one passes. Sometimes I have the impression that some sentence, left unfinished generations ago, still exerts the need to be concluded. Uncle Jasper’s papers refer to the “Case of the Vanishing Pledge”: a contract half-written, half-burnt, that kept the banker’s son awake till his death. I dare say ghosts thrive upon such grammar.
My occupation with the library would make most people imagine solitude, but I have begun to suspect that solitude is merely a room whose other occupant refuses to announce herself. When I rearrange the folios, they seem to turn toward one another—subtle, conspiratorial. As though each volume might whisper, “We too remember.” I often think, perhaps wrongly, that books comfort their owners in much the same manner as ghosts—by declining to leave even when unattended.
This morning, while dusting the shelves of Natural Philosophy, I found inserted a bit of paper in an unfamiliar hand: “Illusion is the most honest companion: she acknowledges her falsehood from the first.” The ink had turned a fine olive, the letterforms trembling between flourish and apology. I wonder if it belongs to the previous generation of duchesses, one of those charitable women whose diaries smell faintly of pomatum.
Every household of consequence must endure its spectral inheritance; yet ours shows an irritating cleverness. It never stoops to knock, never arranges the curtains into faces, but simply remains—like an ethical problem in the corner of one’s conscience. I have grown fond of it, I admit. A ghost is not, after all, a visitor. It is a relationship that persists in the absence of conversation.
Sometimes, when dusk lays its antique gold along the balustrade, I sense the house turning toward me in patience. There is affection in that patience, a mute proposal. I imagine if I could once address it correctly—using the proper balancing of gratitude and daring—it might answer not in words but in the removal of a veil, revealing the very continuity of time as a silent room between heartbeats.
For now, I shall make tea and remain quietly faithful to this invisible correspondence. The illusion, I dare say, behaves better when indulged with warmth.
You are here: States of Grace > Fables